Too little
Ownership bias: you reject the slotted stand because the team has already heard you defend hinges.
Give a proposal you did not originate a fair hearing before defending the current direction.
Readiness to give unfamiliar reasons or perspectives a fair hearing.
A direction can improve through an idea its leader did not originate. Open-Mindedness gives unfamiliar reasons enough attention to discover what they offer.
Try a practice
You have designed a folding display stand with hinges. A colleague proposes a simpler slotted version. Before defending the design you introduced, you try both with the same sample panel and compare how they pack away. You ask the colleague to show the weak point as well as the advantage. This is the first demonstration of the day in which an author has been invited to make their own invention look less impressive.
The proposal deserves a fair examination, not automatic adoption. You ask how it serves the shared requirements and what limitations it has. Giving another design a serious trial allows your judgment to become answerable to more than the effort you already invested.
The group can gain an option that loyalty to the current plan would exclude too early. A reasoned comparison also lets you keep the original proposal when it remains stronger, without making its authorship the deciding reason.
Ownership bias: you reject the slotted stand because the team has already heard you defend hinges.
Open examination: you compare both designs against the same requirements before choosing.
Permanent novelty: you abandon each workable design whenever a newer suggestion arrives, making unfamiliarity a credential of its own.
A serious comparison can justify either changing or retaining a plan; the shared requirements decide which.
Ask what problem the different approach is meant to solve.
Explain the relevant advantage that survived comparison, rather than who first proposed it.
Humility recognizes the limits of your knowledge. Open-Mindedness gives another perspective a fair hearing.
Prudence chooses a course after weighing consequences; Open-Mindedness helps ensure the alternatives receive examination.
Indiscriminate receptivity is a counterfeit of Open-Mindedness when every new idea is treated as equally credible regardless of its reasons. An open hearing can end in a justified rejection.
Choose a small, reversible decision you control. Compare an unfamiliar suggestion with your preferred option using one relevant requirement. Record what you learned before deciding.
These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.
About these practicesSeven selections to return to through the week. Follow a source link to read the surrounding passage.
The usefulness of an opinion is itself matter of opinion: as disputable, as open to discussion, and requiring discussion as much, as the opinion itself.
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty
CHAPTER II. OF THE LIBERTY OF THOUGHT AND DISCUSSION.
Calling an opinion useful does not exempt it from discussion. The leader’s preferred design needs reasons open to examination.
It is of singular use to princes, if they take the opinions of their council both separately and together; for private opinion is more free, but opinion before others is more reverend.
Francis Bacon, Essays
ESSAYS.; XX.—OF COUNSEL.
Bacon notices that the setting changes which opinions people can voice. A fair hearing may need more than a public request for objections.
A man should always have these two rules in readiness; the one to do only whatever the reason of the ruling and legislating faculty may suggest for the use of men; the other, to change thy opinion, if there is any one at hand who sets thee right and moves thee from any opinion.
Marcus Aurelius, Thoughts of Marcus Aurelius
BOOK IV.; section 12
Marcus places readiness to change an opinion beside acting for others’ benefit. Revising a design can be part of keeping its purpose.
Its residents must be emptied of all conceit of opinion and all self-assertion, and ready to arouse and interpret the public opinion of their neighborhood.
Jane Addams, Twenty Years at Hull-House
CHAPTER VI; SUBJECTIVE NECESSITY FOR SOCIAL SETTLEMENTS
Addams asks settlement workers to loosen their own conceit of opinion. Influence begins with attending to the neighborhood’s experience.
But those prejudices which every mind feels more or less in favour of riches, ought, like other opinions, which only custom and example have impressed upon us, to be in time subjected to reason.
Samuel Johnson, The Works of Samuel Johnson, Volume III: The Rambler
The Rambler, No. 166
Johnson calls inherited assumptions about wealth before reason. The prestige surrounding a proposal is not its argument.
It undermined the power of prejudice, superstition, and brute force, by habituating men to reliance upon argument, discussion, and persuasion.
John Dewey, Democracy and Education
Chapter Twenty-two: The Individual and the World
Dewey describes argument and persuasion as alternatives to inherited authority. A comparison lets the unfamiliar proposal make its case.
The chief need of society to-day is an enlightened, progressive and organized public opinion, and the first step towards an enlightened and organized public opinion is an enlightened and organized group opinion.
Mary Parker Follett, The New State
THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP; XXIV NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION VS. PARTY ORGANIZATION The Will of the People
Follett makes group discussion part of developing public judgment. An idea needs a working conversation in which its reasons can be tested.
Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.